Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW] update doc and notebook #1299

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 9, 2020

Conversation

Iroy30
Copy link
Contributor

@Iroy30 Iroy30 commented Dec 8, 2020

No description provided.

@Iroy30 Iroy30 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2020 05:29
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@GPUtester
Copy link
Contributor

Please update the changelog in order to start CI tests.

View the gpuCI docs here.

@Iroy30 Iroy30 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2020 17:14
@BradReesWork BradReesWork added this to the 0.17 milestone Dec 8, 2020
@BradReesWork BradReesWork added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Dec 8, 2020
@Iroy30
Copy link
Contributor Author

Iroy30 commented Dec 8, 2020

rerun tests

@Iroy30 Iroy30 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2020 23:49
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 9, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1299 (9a8e4a0) into branch-0.17 (f45c221) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           branch-0.17    #1299   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        60.38%   60.38%           
============================================
  Files               67       67           
  Lines             3029     3029           
============================================
  Hits              1829     1829           
  Misses            1200     1200           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
python/cugraph/traversal/sssp.py 93.63% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f45c221...9a8e4a0. Read the comment docs.

@BradReesWork BradReesWork merged commit 5cff397 into rapidsai:branch-0.17 Dec 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants